Aug. 13, 2012: Commentary
By Reid Spencer
NASCAR Wire Service
WATKINS
GLEN, N.Y. -- It's easy to identify all the winners and losers from
Sunday's Finger Lakes 355 at Watkins Glen International -- or is it?
Here's my take on a wild race at the Glen:
Winner
-- Marcos Ambrose, of course. Not that Ambrose needed to remind anyone
of his road course credentials, but Ambrose is all but unbeatable at the
Glen, having won
there three times in the NASCAR Nationwide Series and twice straight in
Sprint Cup. The victory gives Ambrose a glimmer of hope where the Chase
is concerned, if he can do something he's never done before -- win on
an oval. Next on the schedule is Michigan,
where Ambrose won the pole in June. "There's no reason why we can't go
there and surprise them again," Ambrose said.
Loser
-- Kyle Busch. A second victory would have made Busch's path into the
Chase for the Sprint Cup a lot less thorny, and Busch looked like a
winner when he took the
white flag with an eight car-length lead over Brad Keselowski. But
Busch was derailed by oil in the racing groove in Turn 1 and lost the
lead when Keselowski also slid in the oil and knocked him for a loop in
Turn 2. Busch nevertheless finished seventh, but
he still hasn't found his second win.
Winner
-- Brad Keselowski. Losing the duel with Ambrose cost Kez what would
have been a series-leading fourth victory, but the driver of the No. 2
Dodge nevertheless gained
two spots to a solid fifth in the Cup standings. Keselowski, who also
finished second in Saturday's Nationwide race, also scored bonus points
for his sportsmanship after both events. Not wanting to make enemies
before the Chase, Keselowski says he's banking
"nice-guy points" for the final 10 races.
Loser
-- Denny Hamlin. Feeling the heat from flames through the firewall
after his engine exploded on Sunday, Hamlin also is feeling the heat of
the Chase bubble, where
he landed after his 34th-place finish. True, Hamlin has an insurance
policy with his two victories earlier this season, but he's now in a
vulnerable position. Now 10th in points and just 40 points ahead of
Kasey Kahne, Hamlin could lose six bonus points to
start the Chase (three for each win) if he has more bad luck and falls
out of the top 10.
Winner
-- Jeff Gordon. Winner? Yes, though Gordon spun on oil in the final
corner, finished 21st and lost control of the provisional Chase wild
card spot he occupied after
winning at Pocono, he dodged a bullet on Sunday. A Kyle Busch victory
would have forced Gordon to win one of the next four races to secure a
spot in the Chase. As it stands now, Gordon can reclaim a provisional
wild-card spot by winning a race or by outscoring
Ryan Newman by 11 points and Busch by five over the next four races,
providing neither of those drivers (or Ambrose, Carl Edwards or Joey
Logano) posts a win.
Loser
-- Dale Earnhardt Jr. Poised for a top-10 finish, Earnhardt overdrove
the inner loop and spun at the entrance to Turn 5 with six laps left. In
his own words Earnhardt
"drove like a dummy" and cost himself the series lead, dropping from
first to fourth in the standings. But Earnhardt Nation can take heart.
The damage is merely cosmetic. When the Chase field is re-racked after
Richmond four races from now, the number of victories
is paramount, and who's in first today matters not at all.
Winner
-- The large, enthusiastic crowd at Watkins Glen, which saw one of the
most exciting finishes of the season. Collectively, Sprint Cup drivers
have become much more
proficient at road courses over the past decade. "Brad Keselowski and
Kyle Busch are two of the best road racers I've ever been around," said
Ambrose, who is without peer. The quality of competition at road
courses, which was lacking in the 1990s but is in
full flower now, would argue for the inclusion of another road course
on the Cup schedule, ideally in the Chase. Sonoma is lovely in
September. So is Montreal, which doesn't have to compete against the
NFL. NASCAR chairman and CEO said in July that a road
course in the Chase wasn't a priority. In light of Sunday's action,
it's time to re-evaluate that position.
No comments:
Post a Comment